Transportation Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE
Vol. 41, No. 4, November 2007, pp. 431-443
DOI: 10.1287/trsc.1070.0214
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lulli, G.
Right arrow Articles by Odoni, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

The European Air Traffic Flow Management Problem

Guglielmo Lulli, Amedeo Odoni

Department of Informatics, Systems and Communication, University of Milano Bicocca, Via Bicocca degli Arcimboldi 8, 20126 Milano, Italy
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

lulli{at}disco.unimib.it
arodoni{at}mit.edu

Air traffic flow management in Europe has to deal as much with capacity constraints in en route airspace as with the more usual capacity constraints at airports. The en route sector capacity constraints, in turn, generate complex interactions among traffic flows. We present a deterministic optimization model for the European air traffic flow management (ATFM) problem. The model designs flow management strategies involving combinations of ground and airborne holding. The paper illustrates the complex nature of European (EU) ATFM solutions, the benefits that can be obtained by purposely assigning airborne holding delays to some flights, and the issues of equity that arise as a result of the interactions among traffic flows. In particular, we show that, in certain circumstances, it is better, in terms of total delay and delay cost, to assign to a flight a more expensive airborne holding delay than a ground delay. We also show that in the EU ATFM context, fundamental conflicts may often arise between the objectives of efficiency and equity (or "fairness"). This finding may have profound implications for the possibility of developing a "collaborative decision-making" environment for air traffic flow management in Europe.

Key Words: air traffic flow management; air traffic control; airport delays; air traffic delays
History: Received: March 2006; revised: November 2006; accepted: July 2007.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by INFORMS.