Transportation Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE
Vol. 40, No. 4, November 2006, pp. 540-542
DOI: 10.1287/trsc.1060.0162
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Strong Regularity and the Sensitivity Analysis of Traffic Equilibria: A Comment

Stephen M. Robinson

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1513 University Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1572
smrobins{at}wisc.edu

Patriksson (2004) analyzes the sensitivity of solutions of traffic equilibrium problems. One of his central results deals with directional differentiability in the elastic-demand case. Unfortunately, his proof contains crucial errors, and the purpose of this comment is to explain what they are and why they render the proof incorrect. The consequence is that Patriksson’s proof of his Theorem 5 is invalid, so the theorem must be regarded as unproven.

Key Words: traffic equilibria; sensitivity; strong regularity
History: Received: December 2005; accepted: April 2006.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Transportation ScienceHome page
S. Lu
Sensitivity of Static Traffic User Equilibria with Perturbations in Arc Cost Function and Travel Demand
Transportation Science, February 1, 2008; 42(1): 105 - 123.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by INFORMS.