Transportation Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE
Vol. 40, No. 2, May 2006, pp. 226-234
DOI: 10.1287/trsc.1050.0117
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Archetti, C.
Right arrow Articles by Speranza, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Worst-Case Analysis for Split Delivery Vehicle Routing Problems

Claudia Archetti, Martin W. P. Savelsbergh, M. Grazia Speranza

Department of Quantitative Methods, University of Brescia, C. da S. Chiara 50, 25122 Brescia, Italy
School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0205
Department of Quantitative Methods, University of Brescia, C. da S. Chiara 50, 25122 Brescia, Italy

archetti{at}eco.unibs.it
mwps{at}isye.gatech.edu
speranza{at}eco.unibs.it

In the vehicle routing problem (VRP) the objective is to construct a minimum cost set of routes serving all customers where the demand of each customer is less than or equal to the vehicle capacity and where each customer is visited once. In the split delivery vehicle routing problem (SDVRP) the restriction that each customer is visited once is removed. We show that the cost savings that can be realized by allowing split deliveries is at most 50%. We also study the variant of the VRP in which the demand of a customer may be larger than the vehicle capacity, but where each customer has to be visited a minimum number of times. We show that the cost savings that can be realized by allowing more than the minimum number of required visits is again at most 50%. Furthermore, we analyze the performance of simple heuristics that handle customers with demands larger than the vehicle capacity by employing full load out-and-back trips to these customers until the demands become less than or equal to the vehicle capacity. Finally, we investigate situations in which demands are discrete and vehicle capacities are small.

Key Words: vehicle routing; split deliveries; worst-case analysis
History: Received: September 2004; revised: December 2004; accepted: January 2005.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Transportation ScienceHome page
A. Ceselli, G. Righini, and M. Salani
A Column Generation Algorithm for a Rich Vehicle-Routing Problem
Transportation Science, February 1, 2009; 43(1): 56 - 69.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Transportation ScienceHome page
J. W. Ohlmann, M. J. Fry, and B. W. Thomas
Route Design for Lean Production Systems
Transportation Science, August 1, 2008; 42(3): 352 - 370.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Transportation ScienceHome page
C. Archetti, M. G. Speranza, and M. W. P. Savelsbergh
An Optimization-Based Heuristic for the Split Delivery Vehicle Routing Problem
Transportation Science, February 1, 2008; 42(1): 22 - 31.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Transportation ScienceHome page
M. Nowak, O. Ergun, and C. C. White III
Pickup and Delivery with Split Loads
Transportation Science, February 1, 2008; 42(1): 32 - 43.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by INFORMS.