Transportation Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE
Vol. 38, No. 3, August 2004, pp. 357-368
DOI: 10.1287/trsc.1030.0038
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberger, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Nemhauser, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

A Robust Fleet-Assignment Model with Hub Isolation and Short Cycles

Jay M. Rosenberger, Ellis L. Johnson, George L. Nemhauser

Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, P.O. Box 19017, Arlington, Texas 76019
School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0205
School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0205

jrosenbe{at}uta.edu
ellis.johnson{at}isye.gatech.edu
george.nemhauser{at}isye.gatech.edu

Airline decision makers cancel flights in operations because of disruptions. When canceling a flight, they usually cancel a cycle, a sequence of flights that begins and ends at the same airport. Consequently, a fleet assignment and aircraft rotation with many short cycles is frequently less sensitive to a flight cancellation than one with only a few short cycles. In this paper, we determine a lower bound for the number of short cycles using the hub connectivity of a fleet assignment, and we present fleet-assignment models (FAMs) that embed many short cycles and reduce hub connectivity within a solution. We show that solutions to such models perform better in operations than those of traditional FAMs that minimize planned operating cost and passenger spill.

Key Words: air transportation; fleet assignment; robust planning; hub insolation; integer programming
History: Received: January 2002; revised: September 2002; accepted: February 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Transportation ScienceHome page
B. C. Smith and E. L. Johnson
Robust Airline Fleet Assignment: Imposing Station Purity Using Station Decomposition
Transportation Science, November 1, 2006; 40(4): 497 - 516.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Transportation ScienceHome page
S. Shebalov and D. Klabjan
Robust Airline Crew Pairing: Move-up Crews
Transportation Science, August 1, 2006; 40(3): 300 - 312.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by INFORMS.