This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sherali, H. D. Articles by Trani, A. A. Search for Related Content

An Airspace Planning and Collaborative Decision–Making Model: Part I—Probabilistic Conflicts, Workload, and Equity Considerations

Grado Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering (0118), Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061
Department of Operational Sciences, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433
Charles Edward Via, Jr. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (0105), Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061
hanifs{at}vt.edu
raymond.staats{at}afit.edu
vuela{at}vt.edu

We present a large–scale, airspace planning and collaborative decision–making model (APCDM) to enhance the management of the U.S. National Airspace System (NAS). Given a set of flights that must be scheduled during some planning horizon, along with alternative surrogate trajectories for each flight as prompted by various airspace restriction scenarios imposed by dynamic severe weather systems or space launch special use airspaces (SUA), we develop a mixed–integer programming model to select a set of flight plans from among these alternatives, subject to flight safety, air traffic control workload, and airline equity constraints. The model includes a three–dimensional probabilistic conflict analysis, the derivation of valid inequalities, the development of air traffic control workload metrics, and the consideration of equity among airline carriers in absorbing costs related to rerouting, delays, and possible cancellations. The resulting APCDM model has potential use for both tactical and strategic applications, such as air traffic control in response to severe weather phenomena or spacecraft launches, FAA policy evaluation (separation standards, workload restrictions, sectorization strategies), Homeland Defense contingency planning, and military air campaign planning. The model can also serve a useful role in augmenting the FAA's National Playbook of standardized flight profiles in different disruption–prone regions of the national airspace. The present paper focuses on the theory and model development; Part II of this paper will address model parameter estimations and implementation test results.

History: Received: May 2003; revised: July 2003; accepted: July 2003.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. D. Sherali, R. W. Staats, and A. A. Trani An Airspace-Planning and Collaborative Decision-Making Model: Part II--Cost Model, Data Considerations, and Computations Transportation Science, May 1, 2006; 40(2): 147 - 164. [Abstract] [PDF]