Transportation Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE
Vol. 37, No. 2, May 2003, pp. 139-152
DOI: 10.1287/trsc.37.2.139.15249
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sun, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Procedures for Finding Nondominated Solutions for Multiple Objective Network Programming Problems

Minghe Sun

College of Business, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78249
msun{at}utsa.edu

Procedures for finding nondominated solutions for multiple objective network programming problems are developed and tested. Nondominated solutions are obtained by solving augmented weighted Tchebycheff network programs. The procedures exploit the network structure of the problem in order to speed up the solution process. To use the network structure as much as possible, a weighted-sum network problem and/or a min-max network problem are solved in order to find a basic solution that is close to the optimal solution of the augmented weighted Tchebycheff network program. Starting from this basic solution, the special simplex method for network problems with side constraints is finally applied to solve the augmented weighted Tchebycheff network program. Computational results show that, for the test problems used in this study, up to 70% of computation time can be saved with the proposed procedures as compared with the sole application of the special simplex method for network problems with side constraints. These procedures can be incorporated into any interactive multiple-objective programming procedure which uses sample nondominated solutions to solve multiple-objective network programming problems.

History: Received: July 2000; revised: January 2002; accepted: January 2002.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Management ScienceHome page
J. Wallenius, J. S. Dyer, P. C. Fishburn, R. E. Steuer, S. Zionts, and K. Deb
Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: Recent Accomplishments and What Lies Ahead
Management Science, July 1, 2008; 54(7): 1336 - 1349.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
INFORMS Journal on ComputingHome page
M. Sun
Warm-Start Routines for Solving Augmented Weighted Tchebycheff Network Programs in Multiple-Objective Network Programming
INFORMS Journal on Computing, January 1, 2005; 17(4): 422 - 437.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by INFORMS.