Transportation Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE
Vol. 37, No. 1, February 2003, pp. 1-22
DOI: 10.1287/trsc.37.1.1.12822
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Croxton, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Magnanti, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Models and Methods for Merge–in–Transit Operations

Keely L. Croxton, Bernard Gendron, Thomas L. Magnanti

Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University, Suite 518, Fisher Hall, 2100 Neil Avenue, Colombus, Ohio 43210–1144
Département d'informatique et de recherche opérationnelle, and Centre de recherche sur les transports, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, succ. Centre–ville, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3C 3J7
School of Engineering, and Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Room 1–206, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139–4307

croxton{at}cob.osu.edu
bernard{at}crt.umontreal.ca
magnanti{at}mit.edu

We develop integer programming formulations and solution methods for addressing operational issues in merge–in–transit distribution systems. The models account for various complex problem features, including the integration of inventory and transportation decisions, the dynamic and multimodal components of the application, and the nonconvex piecewise linear structure of the cost functions. To accurately model the cost functions, we introduce disaggregation techniques that allow us to derive a hierarchy of linear programming relaxations. To solve these relaxations, we propose a cutting–plane procedure that combines constraint and variable generation with rounding and branch–and–bound heuristics. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach on a large set of test problems with instances derived from actual data from the computer industry that contain almost 500,000 integer variables.

History: Received: September 2000; revised: April 2001; accepted: October 2001.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
H. Song, V. N. Hsu, and R. K. Cheung
Distribution Coordination Between Suppliers and Customers with a Consolidation Center
Operations Research, September 1, 2008; 56(5): 1264 - 1277.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
K. L. Croxton, B. Gendron, and T. L. Magnanti
Variable Disaggregation in Network Flow Problems with Piecewise Linear Costs
Operations Research, January 1, 2007; 55(1): 146 - 157.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Operations ResearchHome page
A. B. Keha, I. R. de Farias Jr., and G. L. Nemhauser
A Branch-and-Cut Algorithm Without Binary Variables for Nonconvex Piecewise Linear Optimization
Operations Research, September 1, 2006; 54(5): 847 - 858.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by INFORMS.